Editorial Policy
Our editorial process separates factual claims, analysis, commercial recommendations and affiliate relationships so users can see what is verified, what is interpretation and what may change.
Source hierarchy
Primary sources first
For consequential claims, we prefer regulator or government material, official operator terms, official payment/product documentation and responsible-gambling authorities.
Secondary sources carefully
Specialist publications, journalism and secondary summaries can add context, but they do not replace an available primary source for a critical factual claim.
How we handle changing information
Availability, payments, bonuses and other commercial facts can change quickly. These pages are treated as fast-changing and should be rechecked when an operator, regulator or product materially changes.
Corrections
If a factual error is identified, the affected passage should be corrected and any other page that repeats the same fact should be reviewed for consistency.
What we avoid
- Fabricated first-person experience or credentials.
- Unsupported claims about licensing, payments, bonuses or operator availability.
- Keyword-density writing that reduces clarity.
- Creating thin pages merely because a search query uses different wording.